scifi.com logohome
This site requires Flash.  Download the free plug-in here.
SCIFIPEDIA Welcome to SCIFIPEDIA, SCI FI's free encyclopedia that anyone can add to.
Current number of entries: 10,173

Create Account / Log In

Browse SCIFIPEDIA

Random Page Start a new article SCIFIPEDIA RSS Feed Help build SCIFIPEDIA

Patterson-Gimlin Bigfoot film


<span class="SFPTagline"> From SCIFIPEDIA </span>

The Patterson-Gimlin Bigfoot film is the best known alleged movie of a real hairy biped.

Contents

Overview

October 20th, 1967. Roger Patterson, a Bigfoot enthusiast who had self-published a book on the subject the year before, is in the Bluff Creek area of Northern California. He is making a documentary with a rented 16mm camera, and has been shooting background landscape footage. He's heard about reports in this wilderness area, including a find of gigantic footprints within the last few months.

According to Patterson (and Robert Gimlin, who accompanied him), they had an amazing encounter. They came across a Bigfoot. Patterson's horse reared, apparently frightened by the huge beast. Scrabbling to get the camera out of the saddlebag, Patterson grabbed the camera and began filming and running after the creature simultaneously.

The film (which runs less than a minute) is shaky in the beginning, which fits Patterson's story. However, it is clear that the film depicts a bipedal figure walking away from the camera, arms swinging. There is a now iconic moment, when "Patty" (as the subject has become known) looks back over her (the pendulous breasts have led most observers to interpret the creature as female) shoulder at Patterson. Patterson has reportedly described this look as one of contempt and disgust, presumably at these puny intruders.

Had Patterson gotten the proof that followers had sought for almost ten years?

Reaction and Distribution

If Patterson believed that merely presenting this footage would convince scientists of the existence of a hairy biped in the American Northwest, he must have been disappointed. Most scientists weren't willing to look at it. Even if it was genuine, it wouldn't be proof. If it was a hoax (which must have seemed likely to many mainstream scientists), even having examined it could be damaging to their reputations.

Reportedly, Patterson's documentary did play locally, but it didn't reach a wide audience.

Ivan T. Sanderson in Argosy (1968)

In the February 1968 issue of Argosy, a "men's adventure" magazine, Ivan T. Sanderson wrote an article about the film entitled, First Photos of Bigfoot, California's "Abominable Snowman". Sanderson was a well-known naturalist who had written a comprehensive book on hairy bipeds in 1961. While a significant amount of the article is about the controversy, it certainly did not dismiss the movie as a hoax.

John Napier and Bigfoot: The Yeti and Sasquatch in Myth and Reality (1973)

Napier, a primatologist who had been the Director of the Primate Biology program at the Smithsonian, had seen the film in a showing in Washington D. C. on December 2, 1967 (just weeks after it was taken). He claimed to have watched a half-dozen times then, and examined it frame by frame since that time. He reproduces (as an appendix) a report by D. W. Grieve, a British biomechanician.

"Perhaps it was a man dressed up in a monkey-skin; if so it was a brilliantly executed hoax and the unknown perpetrator will take his place with the great hoaxers of the world. Perhaps it was the first film of a new type of hominid, quite unknown to science, in which case Roger Patterson deserves to rank with Dubois, the discover of Pithecanthropus erectus or Java man..."

Sunn Classics and The Mysterious Monsters (1976)

Peter Graves narrated this popular documentary which brought the Patterson film to a wide audience.

John Green and Sasquatch: The Apes Among Us (1978)

The 18 page Chapter 6 of the book is entitled Roger Patterson's Movie, and there are passing references throughout the book.

"...it may well prove eventually that the evidence to establish the existence of the sasquatch has been on that piece of film since 1967."

Green discusses attempts to investigate the film, and cites the opinions of experts, from biomechanical to Janos Prohaska, an actor who had portrayed gorillas in numerous movies. The bulk of the opinions he presents lean against a "man-in-a-suit" explanation.

Greg Long and Prometheus (2004)


Popular Culture

Arguments in Favor

Arguments Against

More to come...


This article or section is a SCIFIPEDIA stub for a general, non-categorized, stub. You can improve SCIFIPEDIA by expanding on this stub. Please be sure to consider the other categories assigned to this stub by the original creator. When finished, remove this stub from the article and the article from the Stubs category.


 

 

MENU (TOOLBOX)

PERSONAL TOOLS


2008, SCI FI. All rights reserved.

 

  This page was last modified 21:02, 20 October 2007.  This page has been accessed 1,127 times.
   

 

About SCIFIPEDIA  Disclaimers    Terms of Use   Style Guide   Submission Guidelines

 

 

-->